Download Britain, Turkey and the Soviet Union, 1940–45: Strategy, by Nicholas Tamkin (auth.) PDF

By Nicholas Tamkin (auth.)

Show description

Read or Download Britain, Turkey and the Soviet Union, 1940–45: Strategy, Diplomacy and Intelligence in the Eastern Mediterranean PDF

Best intelligence & espionage books

The Compleat Strategyst: Being a Primer on the Theory of Games of Strategy

This wonderful textual content is vital for a person attracted to online game concept. in basic terms a basic figuring out of mathematics is required to know the mandatory features of technique video games for 2, 3, 4, and extra gamers that characteristic or extra units of inimical pursuits and a unlimited array of zero-sum payoffs.

Ardennes 1944 Peiper & Skorzeny (Elite)

From the earliest making plans levels of the German counter-offensive within the Ardennes in the course of international battle II (1939-1945), Hitler was once confident of the significance of taking the Meuse bridges. He resolved that, while his forces broke in the course of the US strains, one unique unit might be wearing American uniforms and issued with American guns and automobiles.

Democracy in the dark : the seduction of government secrecy

From Dick Cheney's man-sized secure to the nationwide protection Agency's titanic intelligence amassing, secrecy has too usually captured the yankee government's modus operandi greater than the beliefs of the structure. during this vital new e-book, Frederick A. O. Schwarz Jr. , who was once leader tips to the U.

Additional resources for Britain, Turkey and the Soviet Union, 1940–45: Strategy, Diplomacy and Intelligence in the Eastern Mediterranean

Example text

As we have seen, the economic and financial preconditions for Turkish belligerency had not been met. Writing from Ankara, Sir Hughe Knatchbull-Hugessen nonetheless remained remarkably impervious to the logic of the Turkish position, given the appalling state of the Allied war effort at that moment. He insisted that the Turks ‘had allowed themselves to be bluffed’ by rumours of a Soviet attack if Turkey fought on the Allied side. ’1 Soviet claims against Turkey Although Soviet–Turkish relations had deteriorated since the Nazi– Soviet pact, the British embassy in Ankara was not yet convinced that hostility was axiomatic.

An important requirement will be to complete such preparations in Turkey as will give mobility to our forces and enable us to switch them from Egypt and Greece as the need arises . . 49 The Turkish oligarchy may have appreciated the position, but they would not join the war on the promise of ‘bright prospects ahead,’ or of limited British forces which might be transferred to Greece or Egypt. ’50 British policy failed to reconcile the evidence indicating that Yugoslavia could not be relied upon to stand firm, and that the Turks had no confidence in Belgrade.

27 As we shall see in the final chapter of this book, the FO initially failed to take Soviet ambitions in the Caucasus seriously when they were revived in 1945. Like Cripps in Moscow, Hugessen in Ankara was not privy to intercepted SIGINT, possibly contributing to his more optimistic reading of Soviet–Turkish relations. Not all of the evidence from decrypts pointed in one direction, however. 28 Even without access to decrypts, Hugessen and Cripps recognised that agreement on the Straits was unlikely.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.95 of 5 – based on 31 votes